AI code review has the order backwards

The article argues that pull requests were designed for human-speed code and break down when coding agents produce changes faster than reviewers can meaningfully read them, turning approvals into rubber-stamping and "code laundering." It proposes moving judgement to the start by agreeing on a "bar" of machine-verifiable criteria before code exists, with agents building against it and a reviewer model from another family checking the proof. It cites one Saturday (November 7th) on which 197 items landed with no human in the review loop.